Archive for April, 2016

Briefly: bloodletting

April 19, 2016

From Mike McKinley, who reports that he is currently studying with noted Mayanist David Stuart at Texas – Austin, on the San Bartolo Murals, which he says

have images of men doing bloodletting on their … rather enormous and erect penises. This is very rare in Mayan (or any Mesoamerican pre-contact) art. Though it was commonly done, it was NOT shown. This is almost Mapplethorpian to my eyes.

Well, certainly, wildly kinky, at least to modern eyes. A sample (read the images from right to left):

These Mayan murals tell stories in a series of images and so serve as precursors of the graphic novel (some discussion here).

Some readings on language evolution

April 19, 2016

In response to queries (from two non-linguist friends) about Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky, Why Only Us: Language and Evolution (2015), I briefly critiqued universal grammar / innatist positions and the argument that language acquisition would be impossble to explain without them. My friends asked for some sources on the origins and evolution of language that would be accessible for general readers like them (beyond my first suggestion, Dan Everett’s book, listed below). After consultation with knowledgeable colleagues (listed below) – language origins / evolution is not a field that I know much about, so I fell back on asking colleagues – I assembled a list of some readings they suggested (sometimes with reservations). (To reiterate: I am not a language origins guy.)

My consultants (in their enthusiasm for the topic) were inclined to slip into recommending more technical literature and journal articles, and some cited books now in press or at the writing stage (notably Dan Everett’s How Language Began), but I resisted the impulse to list those here.

The topic of language origins / evolution is obviously closely tied to the origins / evolution of human beings (something I am very far from an expert in), and also to two topics I know something about, but as an outsider rather than a specialist: the development of language in children (given Chomskyan innatist arguments based on claims about the “poverty of the stimulus”) and the communication systems of other animals (given the claim that only human beings have language).

Daniel L. Everett, Language: The Cultural Tool (2012)
– review by John McWhorter in the New York Times

James R. Hurford:
The Origins of Language: A Slim Guide (2014)
The Origins of Grammar: Language in the Light of Evolution (2011)
The Origins of Meaning: Language in the Light of Evolution (2007)

Simon M. Kirby:
Function, Selection, and Innateness: The Emergence of Language Universals (1999)
Morton H. Christiansen & SMK, Language Evolution (2003)

Christine Keneally:
The First Word: The Search for the Origins of Language (2008)

Thom Scott-Phillips:
Speaking Our Minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special (2014)

Michael Tomasello:
Origins of Human Communication (2008)

Thanks to Dan Everett, Geoff Pullum, Simon Kirby, and Kenny Smith.

Briefly: Hellboy

April 19, 2016

From Stanford’s news service yesterday, “Comics like Hellboy produce a heightened adventure of reading, Stanford scholar says: Using the Hellboy series as a touchstone, Professor Scott Bukatman has discovered new ways to talk about comics while offering a heightened “adventure of reading.”” by Leah Stark, beginning:

The Hellboy comics – about a demon who tries to resist his predestined role to destroy our world – provide a powerful vantage point from which to view the extraordinary and unique powers of the comic book medium, a Stanford scholar suggests.

That is the viewpoint of Scott Bukatman, a Stanford professor of film and media studies. He researched the Hellboy series by creator Mike Mignola and found that the pleasures of reading a comic book can reveal something about contemporary visual culture and even the act of reading itself.

… Bukatman … details his findings in a new book, Hellboy’s World: Comics and Monsters on the Margins [Univ. of California Press, 2016].

Many different genres are juggled in the Hellboy comics and, as a result, the stories themselves have different tonalities, Bukatman said.

“Some are really funny, some are melancholy. Some are cosmic in scope, others are local and small. There’s a lot of variety within this strange story world that Mignola has come up with,” he said.

Extended discussion in the piece

think of the Xs

April 19, 2016

Start with my 3/31 posting “A kitten-killing God?”, where I looked at a slogan (and caption for an image), with the crucial part bold-faced:

Every time you masturbate, God kills a kitten. Please think of the kittens.

A formulaic pattern Please think of the Xs (with minor variants: Think of the Xs!, Won’t someone (please) think of the Xs?, Won’t anyone think of the Xs? What about the Xs?) — some sort of snowclone, call it Think Of The Xs, exhorting the addressee to stop some activity, on the grounds that it does some damage to the Xs or sets a bad example for the Xs. Nancy’s comment on this posting of mine:

Not wank-related, but “Catmageddon,” the new anti-smoking ad campaign from Truth, makes the following equation: “SMOKING = NO CATS = NO CAT VIDEOS.” Think of the cats!

(more…)

plate my meal

April 19, 2016

Instructions on meals from the Freshly firm, which is currently supplying me with food at home:

[FR] We recommend plating your meal after heating [that is, after heating it in the microwavable tray it comes in]

This has the verbing to plate; from NOAD2:

serve or arrange (food) on a plate or plates before a meal: overcooked vegetables won’t look appetizing, no matter how they are plated.

Two things: why verb the noun plate? And why not other dinnerware nouns?

(more…)

70s Cleaverwear

April 18, 2016

Following up on my posting of the 14th on men’s knitwear with elephant-trunk and snake appendages — apparently intended as underwear but easily interpretable as soft codpieces — Arne Adolfsen posted on Facebook to ask if anyone remembered “Eldridge Cleaver’s foray into haute couture”; an advertisement (available on several sites) from the period, passed on by Arne:

(Many would say this is basse couture.)

(more…)

Meet the Wieners, stampeding in buns

April 18, 2016

The news for penises: dachshunds and hot dogs, in a festival of phallicity.

From AdWeek back on 2/1/16, a delightful story, “Heinz Releases the (Adorable) Hounds in This Hilarious Super Bowl Commercial: David creates ‘weiner stampede’ [on the spelling weiner, see note below] to promote ketchup” By Kristina Monllos:

(#1)

(more…)

Another winged man

April 17, 2016

(Pungently sexual stuff, not for kids or the sexually modest.)

Yesterday on my blogs, on Ganymede (always a beautiful youth) and Zeus (in art, sometimes an eagle, sometimes a winged man, sometimes just a powerful male figure):

on AZBlogX: “Ganymede’s tale” (where I note my long-time fantasy of sex-in-the-air with a winged man)

on this blog: “Ganymede on the fly” (a work of photographic art in which the Ganymede figure realizes this fantasy, magnificently and joyously)

Now to another winged man, i an image that has haunted me for years:

(#1)

A dark, indistinct, noirish, black-and-white image — of TitanMen’s Steve Cannon, in the extreme leather/fetish film Fallen Angel (1997). Some dreams are made of this.

(more…)

Marian Bush

April 17, 2016

The death of a dear friend — not anyone of great fame, but a fine and delightful person, a mainstay of both the Peninsula Sacred Harp singers (who she often hosted at her house) and the Action League of the Peninsula — our very own Raging Grannies.

Marian in Granny gear — she was funny and ornamental, but also earnest and fierce:

I especially remember coming across her at a protest against the invasion of Iraq, respendent in purple and indignation, in a crowd of Grannies. I haven’t been able to find a photo of her leading Sacred Harp, alas.

(more…)

The fish are biting

April 17, 2016

(Vex, vex. I had almost all of this posting put together when — despite automatic saving in WordPress — most of the file vanished, so I had to reconstruct almost everything, including the links, from scratch. Sigh.)

Yesterday’s Calvin and Hobbes from the past:

Two different intransitive verbs bite here: one in panels 2 and 3, another in Hobbes’s question in panel 4. The first is straightforward transitive bite with omitted direct object (yielding one type of intransitive). The second — “[no obj.] (of a fish) take the bait or lure on the end of a fishing line into the mouth” (NOAD2) — seems to be more complicated, but its historical source seems pretty clearly to involve a semantic extension, from a verb referring to using the teeth to cut into something in order to eat it to one referring merely to taking something into the mouth in order to eat it.

(more…)