Archive for March, 2011

Brads

March 20, 2011

For my Sunday morning recreational viewing, a Vivid Video compilation tape entitled Nutrageous (the titles of these things are, well, outrageous), an assortment of man-man porn encounters involving mouths on balls (which scarcely narrows down the field of eligible scenes at all). One of them paired veteran pornstar Peter Wilder with cute dark-haired twink Brad Weber, who was new to me but caught my fancy, so I googled on him, to discover that he has almost no track record in porn, at least under that name. (Pornstars often run through several names in their careers, and occasionally even act under different names according to their film personas.)

But I did find another Vivid compilation, called A Bronco Named Brad — a title that seemed to promise hours of guys riding Brad Weber, but turned out to be something much more peculiar: hours of porn scenes involving pornstars named Brad. Brad Hunter, Brad Chase, Brad Michaels, Brad Weber, Brad Carlton, Brad Phillips, Brad King, and Brad Davis, plus of course a considerable assortment of non-Brad partners for them.

These 8 Brads are just the tip of the porn-Brad iceberg. Some others: Star, Armstrong, Stone, McGuire, Patton, Baldwin, Mason, Rioux, Williams, Hunt, Benton, Thunders, Jarek, Boy. (Brad Boy was inevitable, I suppose.) It’s hard to remember pornstar names, when so many of them are so whitebread. We should be thankful for Brad Rioux, Brad Thunders, Brad Jarek, and of course bad-boy Brad Boy.

But Brad is far from the top porn name; indeed, it’s well down in the pack, way behind Mark/Marc. From my 2005 “Name that porn star handout” (here):

2.  Source of data: cast lists in Adam Gay Video directories for 1993, 1997.
Removed: specifically Black, Hispanic, French, Thai, or Eastern European films.  (Some of the actors nevertheless belong to these groups.)
Raw data: 2,622 tokens.  Analysis of FNs only.
Removed: 27 initialisms (J.D., K.C., J.T., T.J., J.R., J.W, B.J., P.C., etc.), 3 nicknames (Papa Bear, Bat Boy, Angel Boy)…
Remaining: 456 types, counting homophones as a single type.

3.  Distribution by # of tokens:

65        Mark/Marc

56        Steve
54        Mike, John/Jon
51        Tony

49        Sean/Shawn/Shaun
48        Chris/Kris
47        Eric/Erik/Erick/Erich
46        Rick
44        Jeff, Michael, Scott/Scot
43        David
42        Tom/Thom

34        Joe
33        Brian/Bryan/Bryon, Kevin
30        Jim, Nick/Nic/Nik

29        Paul
27        Brad
26        Peter
23        Matt
22        Bill, Jason/Jayson
20        Dan, Greg/Gregg

(At this point, the number of names with a given frequency shoots up.)

In fact, there were 202 unique first names in my data, 44% of the sample.

Still, there are plenty of Brads to go around. And Brad Pitt’s popularity — and his role as an icon of masculinity, a crucial commodity in the pornstar world  — might well have moved Brad up the list in the 14 years since my sources were published.

Zwicky-cat in NYC

March 20, 2011

Caught by Amanda Walker on a New York City street, this vintage poster:

Previous posting on the Zwicky-cat (in the 1950 poster by Donald Brun) in Amsterdam, here. I hate to think what it’s selling for.

Here’s a wider view of the gallery in spring, from its website:

 

Eggcorn, or something

March 20, 2011

Sighted on University Avenue in Palo Alto yesterday morning, this notice in the window of a Vietnamese restaurant:

(Photo — complete with some reflected street trees — by Elizabeth Daingerfield Zwicky.)

(more…)

Data points: non-parallelism 3/19/11

March 19, 2011

From a news bulletin on NPR yesterday, a report on crowds gathering in Sana, Yemen

for Friday prayers and to continue to press their demands

This has a coordination of  unlike syntactic categories, a PP in for (for Friday prayers) and an infinitival VP (to continue to press their demands), so would count as a failure of parallelism according to most of the handbooks. But both conjuncts are functioning as purpose adverbials — for Friday prayers is a brief alternative to something like to say Friday prayers — and this parallelism in function and content frequently trumps the non-parallelism in form.

(more…)

corned beef

March 18, 2011

Yesterday, for St. Patrick’s Day, I had corned beef and cabbage (though I replaced the classic mashed potatoes with jasmine rice, and I had red wine instead of dark beer, so sue me). Of course, this made me think about the expression corned beef.

(more…)

A thousand plus

March 18, 2011

I meant to post when the number of postings to this blog reached 1,000, but I got caught up in other things, and now this is (according to WordPress) #1,034. How quickly they accumulate.

Meanwhile, I’m nearing a hundred postings on my X blog. I haven’t labored to count my postings to Language Log over the years — this would take some actual work — but it’s probably close to 2,000.

That’s a lot of blogging in toto.

 

 

Thingy words

March 18, 2011

Today’s Zippy:

A cartoon festival of stand-in expressions, serving as place-holders for a nominal expression not available to you, either because you can’t recall it or because you never knew it or because there is in fact no common widely available expression for the referent (that is, because there is “no word for it”).

WTF

March 18, 2011

In this morning’s e-mail, an ad for CafePress offerings, including this t-shirt:

(Shown here in cardinal, one of the nine colors available; cardinal is, after all, Stanford’s school color. By the way, there’s nothing on the back of the shirt.)

For Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, see Mark Liberman’s “Annals of Bowdlerization: Whiskey Tango Foxtrot”, here. The expression is military code for WTF, which is an initialistic avoidance of exclamatory what the fuck (or another WH the fuck expression — see Ben Zimmer on the inherent ambiguity of WTF, here).

 

Data points: optional reflexives 3/17/11

March 17, 2011

From “Australia’s truly glamorous camper”, NewScientist 3/5/11, p. 22:

Call it classy camping gear. Baby Australian leafhoppers (Kahaono montana) pitch silk tents to keep them safe from predators.

The point of interest is the non-reflexive object them, anaphoric to the subject baby Australian leafhoppers — in a configuration where a reflexive pronoun (themselves) would normally be expected.

(more…)

Why didn’t you TELL me?

March 17, 2011

Today’s Zits continues a story line that’s been going on for several days. Jeremy’s parents have repeatedly reminded him that they were going to be away for one night. Now the day has come, and he protests that they should have told him:

Another cartoon on the (claimed) transcendance of social media for communication among the young, even over face-to-face talk: if it doesn’t happen on Facebook, it hasn’t happened.