Archive for 2011

Euphemisms?

April 28, 2011

When I collected the remarkable “Royal wedding porn sale” offer on Michael Lucas’s blog, I came across a poll there, asking “What is your favorite euphemism for penis?” (poll announcement here, actual poll here; note that both sites are X-rated).

From the actual poll, it seems that some people take euphemism for to mean ‘word for’ (well, ‘expression for’), taking in a number of things that aren’t euphemisms as I understand them (and treating euphemism for as a relationship between an expression and a thing — “euphemism for (the) penis” — rather than, as I see it, a relationship between expressions — “euphemism for penis“).

(more…)

Phoebe Snow

April 28, 2011

Dead at age 60, on Tuesday, singer-songwriter Phoebe Snow (Wikipedia page here, her own website here). Full of wry charm, with an instantly recognizable voice.

Her most famous song is “Poetry Man”, about (among other things) female desire.

(more…)

Cram it in the boot!

April 28, 2011

An enthusiastic ad campaign for the Mini Cooper car (viewable on many sites, for instance this one), using suggestive, but not actually taboo, vocabulary to catch the viewers’ attention. A very old strategy, but one that can be done with a light and self-mocking tone (“Take it off. Take it all off” for Noxzema Shaving Cream, here) or in a brassy adolescent-showoff way, as here.

(First time I saw it, I thought it might be a Monty Python sketch I had somehow missed. But no.)

(more…)

timesuck the verb?

April 27, 2011

A couple days ago on Facebook, in a comment on derogatory suck, Ann Burlingham expressed delight that timesuck has become a verb. Well, maybe the celebration is a bit premature.

(more…)

Argument structure in porn

April 26, 2011

I take my linguistic examples wherever I come across them. In this case, the data comes mostly from porn. (Warning: a lot of sexual acts will be alluded to in very plain language in this posting.)

The story begins with a young man crying out

(1) Oh yeah, shoot my ass!

at the climactic moment of a segment in the gay porn compilation video A Bronco Named Brad (on the video, see here). The speaker is asking his partner to

(2) ‘shoot [your cum] on my ass, ejaculate on my buttocks’ [ONTO reading]

(It’s a convention of porn films, gay and straight, that the money shot must be visible to the viewer, so that guys come on someone else’s body or on their own, or occasionally on the furniture or whatever — see me on mess here. In gay porn, a fuck scene often ends with the fucker pulling out and coming on his partner’s buttocks, staying in situ but displaying his ejaculation.)

In other contexts, (1) could convey

(3) ‘shoot [your cum] in(to) my ass, ejaculate in(to) my anus’ [INTO reading]

Note the two different senses of ass here — ‘buttocks’ or ‘anus’, with the anus being the centerpiece of the buttocks, so to speak — related metonymically.

((1) on the INTO reading describes the culmination of bareback fucking, without the pull-out, so its natural home is porn writing, not porn films.)

But now for the main linguistic point, shoot ‘ejaculate’ used, exceptionally, as a transitive verb.

(more…)

Weighty words

April 26, 2011

Today’s Bizarro, in which a metaphor comes vividly to life:

Weighty used of speech is venerable; OED2 subentry:

4. a. Of an argument, utterance, etc.: Producing a powerful effect; adapted to influence or convince; forcible, telling, potent. [moste weightie wordes in 1560 and other cites thereafter]

Data points: anaphora 4/25/11

April 25, 2011

An account to friends of my sighting a famous Palo Alto resident who happens to be (like me) a Princeton graduate.

Dinner at Mandarin Goumet, couple to my left, the man very familiar-looking, older, ramrod-straight, expensive but understated suit, imperious in tone. Then the guy to his right and my left mentioned Princeton, and he and I both swiveled to look at him for a moment.

The issue is the referent of the he and the referent of the him in the final clause. Two men have been mentioned, and in principle either pronoun could refer to either of them. But my little tale was about the first man mentioned, and he is clearly the referent of the he, so that the second man must be the referent of the him. I could have used the first man and the second man (or some other NPs), but 3sg personal pronouns do the trick just fine, despite the in-principle ambiguity of my version.

James Jean

April 25, 2011

I’ve been working my way (mailing things out to friends) through a book of postcards, XOXO, based on work by the prolific James Jean, an artist and illustrator with roots in comics. Fantastical drawings and paintings, often disturbing, often with figures of children in them, often with symbolic sexual content.

Three examples: the first a complex piece from XOXO, then one with a distressed child, then a coral dog sporting a bright coral phallus:

A Passover toast (with Coke)

April 25, 2011

As Passover draws to a close, a wonderful piece from the April 23 NYT about Rabbi Tuvia Geffen, which starts with a ritual blessing (Samuel G. Freedman, “A Passover Toast to a Rabbi Known for Social Activism, and for Kosher Coca-Cola”):

Rabbi Tuvia Geffen, of blessed memory, was born in Lithuania in 1870 and educated there in the renowned Slobodka yeshiva.

(more…)

On the taboo avoidance patrol

April 25, 2011

Two recent cases:

In Guirgis’s seventh full-length play, “The Motherf**ker with the Hat” (at the Gerald Schoenfeld), audience members are treated to the author’s customary craftsmanship and themes, … (Hilton Als, “War Games” [review of “The Motherfucker with the Hat”], New Yorker 4/25/11, p. 86)

[Joel Berson to ADS-L 4/22/11 on “This sucks”] Too taboo apparently for the Boston Globe sports section today.  Lawrence Academy has had its football program sanctioned and its consecutive league championships of the past two seasons taken away by the Independent School League.  Neither the league nor the academy has so far specified the violations.  One former player is quoted by the Globe as saying “This absolutely [stinks]”, and the worst part is no one can give us a straight answer.”

I assume, but cannot know, that the deleted word is “sucks”.

(more…)