Archive for the ‘Linguistics in the comics’ Category

The power of intonation

November 6, 2011

Yesterday’s Bizarro:

This is really about the power of intonation; punctuation comes into it only insofar as it can be recruited to convey the intonation of these two utterances. The first has the intonation of a declarative, the second the intonation of a type of interrogative (with a final rise) — in fact, a type of reclamatory question, used to seek a repetition of something you haven’t understood or an explanation of something you understood but can’t accept.

The exclamation point (!) is used to indicate emphasis (associated with greater intensity and/or higher pitch), the interrobang (?!) to indicate a combination of interrogativity (rising final) and emphasis.

Formulaic language brought to life

November 3, 2011

Today’s Zits:

Jeremy’s dad is startled to see flying pigs. But then he finds out that Jeremy cleaned his bathroom without being threatened. So he reasons: for Jeremy to do this, pigs will have to fly; Jeremy has done this; therefore, pigs must be flying. The flying pigs are explained.

When pigs fly is a formula conveying ‘never’, given that pigs don’t fly: if you say that X will happen when pigs fly, you’re saying that pigs flying is a precondition for X happening, so if that precondition can’t ever be satisfied, then X won’t ever happen. Any precondition that the speaker believes won’t ever happen could serve in this reasoning, but pigs flying has been conventionalized for this purpose.

Dancing With the Starving

November 2, 2011

Tom Toles’s political cartoon of 9/29/11, about the Republican Party’s attempts to entice New Jersey governor Chris Christie to run for President:

A somewhat labored phrasal portmanteau, based on the name of the tv show Dancing With the Stars, with starving substituted for stars.

(Hat tip to Victor Steinbok.)

Today’s silly pun

October 30, 2011

To recognize the end of the World Series (of baseball in the U.S.) on Friday, with the St. Louis Cardinals winning over the Texas Rangers in game 7, this punning combination of music and baseball from cartoonist Dan Reynolds:

(From Michael Siemon via Michael Palmer on Facebook.)

Morphological analysis

October 30, 2011

A little bit of morphological analysis is a dangerous thing:

(Via Ron Butters on ADS-L.)

Adverb play

October 23, 2011

Another Bizarro, this time punning on the adverb religiously:

Both senses are variants of ‘in a religious manner’. Without the context supplied by the cartoon, religiously would be taken in the subsense ‘faithfully, conscientiously; strictly, scrupulously; fervently’ (from OED3, December 2009, which has citations from 1534 on). But the cartoon conveys a variant of the subsense ‘with religious feeling or conduct; in accordance with the principles of religion; piously, reverently, devoutly’ (the earliest subsense, with cites from c1384 on) — in particular, ‘in religious dress’, complete with mitre.

I x NY

October 23, 2011

Today’s Bizarro, another cartoon idea from Cliff Harris:

All variants on

I ♥ NY

(for this New York logo and others, see here).

(more…)

Bizarro puns

October 16, 2011

For Sunday, three Bizarro puns, from the outrageous to the subtle. All drawn by Don Piraro, but using joke ideas from Clifford Harris (an M.D. who’s faculty liaison for development at the Stanford Medical Center when he’s not supplying cartoon ideas to Piraro). The most outrageous, a triple play of imperfect puns:

(more…)

Supercharged Sno Balls

October 9, 2011

In the October 6 Zippy, Shelf-Life hawks supercharged Sno Balls:

Several linguistically interesting points here, but I’ll pick two: the portmanteau kidult and the dinosaur in the headlights figure.

(more…)

Auxiliary Reduction in the comics

October 4, 2011

Today’s Bizarro, with a pun on contractions:

The linguistic contractions in question are instances of what’s become known in the trade as Auxiliary Reduction — reduced versions of (certain) auxiliary verbs, which then form a unit with the immediately preceding word. In the examples in the cartoon, the auxiliaries that are reduced are is (or, less likely but still in principle possible, has) and are, and the preceding word in each case is a personal pronoun subject (it, she, we). The resulting elements act in some ways like two-word sequences and in other ways like single words, so they present interesting analytic puzzles.

(more…)