Today’s Mother Goose and Grimm:
A pun — a phonologically perfect pun on pole / Pole — that works here only because the text in the strip is all uppercase, so that the orthographic distinction between the two items vanishes.
Today’s Mother Goose and Grimm:
A pun — a phonologically perfect pun on pole / Pole — that works here only because the text in the strip is all uppercase, so that the orthographic distinction between the two items vanishes.
Posted in Linguistics in the comics, Puns | Leave a Comment »
Via Gregory Ward, a Mark Parisi cartoon from 5/19/09 showing a man in a witness box protesting “I didn’t do nuthin’!”, with the jury all thinking “Ooo! A confession!” — a jury of English majors, as the caption says.
In the popular imagination, English majors are so committed to the idea of grammatical correctness that they are unable to understand non-standard varieties.
Posted in Linguistics in the comics, Negation, Usage attitudes | Leave a Comment »
Today’s Zits:
Has Jeremy been involved in “the practice of taking someone else’s work or ideas and passing them off as one’s own” (NOAD2)? Well, he’s certainly passed off as his own work something that was not. His defense appears to be that there is no person whose work this was; he wasn’t stealing from anyone. A bold move, but one that’s not flying with his teacher.
Posted in Linguistics in the comics, Metaphor, Music, Writing | 2 Comments »
Today’s Zippy dwells on a parsing ambiguity:
Two parsings for the Adj + N + N permanent laundry markers:
(1) Adj + [ N + N ] ‘laundry markers that are permanent’ (Griffy’s intent)
(2) [ Adj + N ] + N ‘markers for permanent laundry’ (Zippy’s understanding)
Posted in Ambiguity, Compounds, Linguistics in the comics | Leave a Comment »
In the May 18th New Yorker, this lovely Charlie Hankin cartoon:
On the caption: this is a show-business meme: We don’t want X; we want an X type. (We don’t want Whoopi Goldberg; we want a Whoopi Goldberg type.) But then there’s the image of a ring-tailed lemur, looking non-plussed — but this is exactly the way the creatures look in the wild:
Posted in Facial expression, Language and animals, Linguistics in the comics, Memes | 2 Comments »
Today’s One Big Happy:
Ruthie intends High Attachment for the adverb again, with the adverb modifying the VP with head feel, and that’s a possible parsing. But Low Attachment, with again modifying the VP with head smashing, is the default parsing, and that’s how Ruthie’s grandmother understands things.
Posted in Ambiguity, Linguistics in the comics, Modification, Parsing | 2 Comments »
Today’s Dilbert, with Alice neatly knifing Ted in the back:
Alice plants the idea in Ted’s head of using social media to make someone look bad, thus tempting him to use the tactic on her. Big pragmatic win for Alice, especially since she has no social media accounts of her own and will look blameless.
Posted in Linguistics in the comics, Pragmatics | Leave a Comment »
Sexy Friday continues, with the war between the sexes in today’s Scenes From a Multiverse:
First, misogynoids launched against the women, then misandroids launched in retaliation, sowing the boner-destroying deathsterone.
Posted in Language and gender, Linguistics in the comics, Metaphor, Portmanteaus | Leave a Comment »
Today’s Zippy, featuring Judge Judy and her hectoring courtroom speech style:
Judge Judy is something of a preoccupation in Zippy, often in combination with Donald Trump (for instance, #2 on 3/17/14, #1 on 5/26/14), sometimes with other pop culture icons (JJ, Howie Mandel, and Dr. Phil on 8/17/13).
Posted in Language and the law, Linguistics in the comics, Pop culture, Style and register | Leave a Comment »
Another in a series about what you have to know to understand what’s going on in a cartoon. This time, the cartoon is by Paul Noth, in the May 11th New Yorker:
Posted in Linguistics in the comics | Leave a Comment »
You are currently browsing the archives for the Linguistics in the comics category.







