Archive for April, 2012

Big roadside attractions

April 21, 2012

At breakfast this morning, my grand-daughter Opal brought along two books: Angry Animals, in the Horrible Science series from UK Scholastic, and volume 4 of The Popularity Papers by Amy Ignatow, in a series about two best friends, Lydia Goldblatt and Julie Graham-Chang. In the current book, Lydia and Julie have just finished sixth grade and are setting off on a “rocky road trip” across the US to visit with their grandparents; family drama plays a big role in the book.

Along the way, one of Julie’s fathers drags them to off-beat roadside attractions, including two in Illinois: the Kaskaskia Dragon (which breathes real fire) and The World’s Largest Catsup Bottle. The girls are totally taken with the dragon, and feed it with $1 tokens again and again and again to get more fire. They are less taken with the catsup bottle, but it occasions a argument about semantics: is the structure, a water tower disguised as a catsup bottle, a structure that has never contained catsup (or ketchup — the girls argue about spelling, too), actually a catsup bottle?

These are real roadside attractions, so I can show you photographs.

The World’s Largest Catsup Bottle occasioned discussion around the breakfast table of other structures that are billed as The World’s Largest X, The Giant X, or The Big X. These are common in the US and in Australia (where they constitute a kind of national preoccupation; there’s even a Wikipedia page on The Big Things of Australia). Opal’s mother has visited a fair number of these, so she could talk with some authority on big roadside attractions.

Meanwhile, Opal really wants to experience the Kaskaskia Dragon and was disappointed to hear just how long the trip from Palo Alto to Kaskaskia is.

(more…)

Anniversaries

April 20, 2012

Chris Ambidge wrote to report a mailing from the San Francisco LGBT Community Center, celebrating its ten-year anniversary; on-line story here. Chris would have said tenth anniversary, and found ten-year anniversary redundant (like PIN number, he said), because ‘year’ is already contained in anniversary. This is one of two complaints about the usage of anniversary: the perceived pleonasm of n-year anniversary. The other complaint is about the perceived contradiction in n-span anniversary for spans other than year, especially month (one-month anniversary, six-month anniversary, six-week anniversary) — again, because ‘year’ is contained in anniversary. The second complaint seems to be the older one; it’s the only one reported in MWDEU (in 1989).

The second innovation presumably arose from a weakening appreciation of the etymology of anniversary, so that the word can be extended to recurring spans of time other than a year (though the default span of time was still a year). Then people began supplying year, for clarity, giving us things like ten-year anniversary, as distinct from ten-month anniversary and ten-week anniversary.

And the complaints piled up.

(more…)

Peanuts vs. the grammar nazis

April 20, 2012

Via several friends on Facebook, this image from Bob Lucas’s wall photos:

On the snowclonelet X nazi, with special reference to grammar nazi, see here and here.

And note that the Peanuts takeoff is about spelling rather than grammar — that is, it’s about garmmra.

 

Odds and ends

April 20, 2012

Three miscellaneous items that came past my eyes this morning: the delicious word fissiparous in the Economist; crash blossoms on the A.Word.A.Day site; and a festival of abbreviations on the Transstellar Journal Publications and Research Consultancy Private Limited site.

(more…)

Gender-appropriate playthings

April 19, 2012

Via Jack Hamilton on Facebook, this cartoon from Shortpacked! by Dave Willis:

Previous postings on this blog: “Dolls and action figures” (on the distinction between the two types of playthings), here, and “Dubious bromanteau” (on brony, bro + pony, as in My Little Pony), here.

On the strip:

Shortpacked! is a webcomic by David Willis set in a toy store. It is part of the Blank Label Comics family. After putting an end to his successful webcomic It’s Walky!, Willis decided to turn Shortpacked!, his autobiographical comic, into a new title. The strip is based in the same universe as It’s Walky! and Roomies!, and features two side characters from the previous comic, Robin and Mike. It is more R-rated than most comic strips that appear in mainstream newspapers, using profanity and sexual innuendos not found in those newspapers. The primary inspiration behind Shortpacked was Willis’ own experiences working retail at Toys “R” Us. (link)

Viewpoint reflexive?

April 19, 2012

Elizabeth Daingerfield Zwicky points me to an interview with Bradford W. Parkinson, the chief architect of GPS, which contains the remarkable sentence

It was hurting themselves.

with an instance of themselves that flagrantly fails to satisfy the Clause-Mate Condition on reflexives in English, requiring that

Reflexive pronouns and their antecedents must belong to the same clause. (link; the sense of belong to here is explained in this posting)

But “untriggered reflexives” also occur in English, and there’s considerable variation from speaker to speaker as to which of these are acceptable. Even with context, Parkinson’s sentence is unacceptable to many speakers, but it does fit into a class of cases that some speakers accept: viewpoint, or perspectival, reflexives.

(more…)

Who(m) to V

April 18, 2012

From a Comcast (cable tv) program description:

(Airdate January 9, 2007)  Stabler and Benson are at odds over whom to believe in a “he said, she said” rape case involving a husband and wife (Blair Underwood, Michael Michele) in the middle of an extremely bitter child-custody dispute.

I was struck by the whom of whom to believe. Not unacceptable, but very much not what I would say or write.

Meanwhile, Stan Carey has posted about a kerfluffle on Twitter, in which various tweeters have objected strongly to the name of the Twitter feature Who to follow. Carey finds this variant entirely acceptable (and the whom variant stilted), as do I. But Business Insider thinks it’s “bad English”; GalleyCat calls it “one of the most viewed and easily overlooked grammar mistakes on the Internet”, adding that it’s “reassuring to watch a major social network struggle” with grammatical rules; Jay Rosen, who teaches journalism at NYU, believes it’s a “grammatical error”; and other Twitter users are variously bothered, disappointed, or annoyed by the phrase. Carey provides lots of quotes, with links.

He maintains that all the critics are wrong and provides a long and detailed account of the who/whom issue, with many citations of sources. Well worth reading.

Here my concern is with the choice of pronouns in the specific construction in the Comcast and Twitter examples.

(more…)

The body language of dogs

April 18, 2012

Lili Chin’s “Doggie Language”:

Or maybe I should say the “body communication” of dogs.

More Lili Chin dogs here; a fair tolerance for cuteness is required.

(Hat tip to Robin Queen, via Facebook.)

huge-quiffed schlemiel

April 18, 2012

In Sunday’s NYT Book Review, a piece by Douglas Wolk (“Dreams of Youth: Lynda Barry’s ‘Blabber Blabber Blabber’ and More”) with the delicious expression “huge-quiffed schlemiel” in it, in a review of a retrospective of Dutch artist Joost Swarte‘s cartoons.

(more…)

excessed

April 17, 2012

In this morning’s NYT, a story “In Schools Cut by the City Ax, Students Bled”, with the following quote:

“They say the school is shrinking, and the social worker was excessed,” he said.

That’s excessed ‘laid off, made redundant’ — a verbing of the noun excess ‘superfluity’. It’s been around for 40 years or so, especially (but not exclusively) with reference to public employees, in particular teachers, and especially in New York City, where it seems to serve as administrative jargon.

(more…)