Archive for 2011

Alphabetizing

November 13, 2011

Back on the 8th, Charlie Doyle posted plaintively to ADS-L about a puzzle in alphabetization:

Yesterday my daughter-in-law called me with a question about my third-grader grandson’s homework. The assignment was to alphabetize a list of words, and the list included the four items girl/girl’s/girls/girls’. (My daughter-in-law made clear than both the academic career of my grandson and the family’s standing in the community were at stake, since the parents of the other third-graders were also depending on my answer.)

I failed. I could tell her that there exist various styles of alphabetizing, that certain traditional “rules” obtain, one of which is “Ignore apostrophes” — but the rules I am aware of don’t fully address the case at hand. I could tell her that if the Microsoft Corporation is asked to “sort” the words alphabetically, they will appear in the order in which I have listed them above, which seems reasonable — but not, as far as I can determine, “authoritative.”

Any suggestions?  (I don’t recall that third grade used to be this hard!)

Two issues here: one, why is the question being asked? and two, what’s the answer?

(more…)

in the private eye

November 12, 2011

Ann Beattie, in an interview on NPR’s Weekend Edition Saturday this morning, about her recent book on Pat Nixon:

… in the way I might go about revealing somebody who was very much in the private eye but who didn’t want to be there at all …

Of course she meant “in the public eye”. A nice error in word retrieval, based on the semantic opposition of public and private, and probably facilitated by Beattie’s thinking of Mrs. Nixon as a very private person. (And possibly encouraged by the fixed expression private eye ‘detective’.)

(more…)

Rock shrimp

November 11, 2011

A recent addition to the menu at Three Seasons in Palo Alto: a rock shrimp appetizer. Yummy. But I wondered about the name rock shrimp: was the compound subsective (so that rock shrimp are a type of shrimp) or non-subsective (so that rock shrimp are distinct from (true) shrimp, the way that rock lobsters, aka spiny lobsters, are distinct from (true) lobsters, daylilies are distinct from (true) lilies, dwarf planets distinct from (true) planets, etc.)?

I asked the owner, John Le Hung, about rock shrimp. He told me that they were not shrimp, that they tasted more like lobster than shrimp (I verified this), and that they had very hard shells, hence the name (shells hard as rock). So: non-subsective.

Then I descended into a confusing landscape of culinary and biological terminology, as with my lobster adventures of a little while ago.

(more…)

The rumor mill

November 11, 2011

Today’s Zippy:

The metaphorical idiom rumor mill literalized, with tidbits, hearsay, and buzz made concrete.

Repurposing beef

November 10, 2011

Today’s Scenes From a Multiverse:

(I especially like the idea that beef sandwiches would be a repurposing of the meat.)

(more…)

From talking about the word to using it

November 10, 2011

Heard this morning on KQED, in an opinion feature about African-American males in Oakland schools, by Pendarvis Harshaw, a teacher in one school program: a report on “I don’t give an f-bomb” and “I don’t give a flying f-bomb” heard from students in the school’s hallways.

F-bomb has an entry in Jesse Sheidlower’s The F Word, of course, but as a (euphemized) mention of fuck, not as a (euphemized) use of it:

the word FUCK or one of its variants or compounds, esp. with reference to it as a shocking or inappropriate term. Often in to drop the F-bomb. (3rd ed., p. 36)

and all the cites (from 1988 through 2008) are for this sense. But Harshaw’s piece has F-bomb (euphemistically) quoting an expression used by people, including high school students, not mentioned by them.

Plenty of cites on the net (14k raw ghits for {“don’t give a flying f-bomb”}), mostly spelled f-bomb. For example,

The thing that REALLY galls the elitists about the South: We Southerners TRULY don’t give a flying f-bomb about your opinion of us.
We are very happy with our simple lives and want to be left alone…. (link)

Don’t get me wrong, I still don’t give a flying f-bomb about the games. I can’t stomach to watch such unstructured and talentless basketball. (link)

I don’t give a flying F-bomb what it [a guitar] looks like if it sounds good. I think I’ll have to get the hot pink one so no one steals it. (link)

Pretty much bound to happen. There are a few hits for “oh, f-bomb it!” ‘oh, fuck it!’ and “f-bombing idiot” ‘fucking idiot’, more for “what the f-bomb!” ‘what the fuck!” Even a report of a t-shirt with the legend “F-bomb that S-bomb” ‘fuck that shit”; now, that’s really ostentatious avoidance.


Big words

November 9, 2011

Today’s Bizarro:

So: big in size as printed, all-caps; or long (and “fancy”) — the latter being the ordinary sense of big word.

(more…)

Disco

November 7, 2011

Today’s Bizarro, with a very distant pun:

As with other distant imperfect puns, this one works only because of all the heavily determining context, ” ___ Savings Time”, which allows disco and daylight to count as equivalent even though they share nothing significant beyond the initial /d/ and their disyllabicity.

(more…)

Smart kid

November 7, 2011

Reported by Ellen Seebacher on Google+ today:

My thirteen-year-old, during a discussion of prescriptive vs. descriptive grammar and constructions on their way out in English:

“So ‘shall’ isn’t exactly packing its bags and walking out the door like ‘whom’, but it’s winding down the conversation and looking at the clock?”

He’s pretty much got it down. Shall and whom will probably be around for a long time, but only in very restricted contexts (“Shall we dance?”, “someone of whom I’ve heard a lot”). So they’ve packed their bags and are sitting in a little corner by the door.

(I was startled to re-read a paper of mine from 1968 a few days ago and was startled to see academese like “We shall show”, where I’d now write “I will show” or “I’ll show”.)

BBoW

November 7, 2011

The iTunes store is offering me the app Vocabador (released 9/6/11), designed to increase your vocabulary — yet another entry in a very crowded field of materials for this purpose, so it comes with a gimmick.

(more…)