Archive for October, 2009

contempt/content

October 4, 2009

In an earlier posting, I reported on an instance of contempt for content, in the expression to your heart’s content. I saw no semantic motivation for the substitution, so I was reluctant to classify the example as an eggcorn (and the substitution hasn’t been discussed on the ecdb site). Instead, the relationship seemed phonological — which would suggest that the example is a classical malapropism originating (as a fair number of CMs do) in a mis-hearing.

Whatever its origins, to one’s heart’s contempt turns out to be surprisingly common. There are thousands of webhits (but none in Google News and only a few in Google Books, so the error doesn’t seem to be spreading into the mainstream), for instance:

… chances are you will be able to scream, yell and panic to your heart’s contempt – briefly – but you won’t be better off for it (link)

“… well, believe what you will, shutter your limited mind to your heart’s contempt.” (Jonathan Kellerman, Self-Defense, p. 428)

So in the mean time…. I am going to travel, play sports, hike and bake to my heart’s contempt ….. (link)

He intended to smoke to his heart’s contempt during this trip. (James W. Foster, Tales of Vollmer’s Hollow, p. 117)

There are also some hits for contempt to VP ‘content to VP’, as in:

The wife was more tired than I and was quite contempt to stay horizontal. So I told her to enjoy her nap … (link)

If it weren’t for the technology being what it is today, I’d be quite contempt to travel back in time – living through the 60s and 70s. (link)

Finally, the reverse substitution, of content for contempt, is attested for in contempt of court, and has been noted in the Eggcorn Forum. A few examples:

Bashir was warned that he might be found in content of court Tuesday if he continues refusing to answer questions. (link)

“The defendant conducted himself with such buffoonery during the beginning of the trial that the judge was forced to hold him in content of court for the remainder of the proceedings.” (link)

The judge indicated the two could be arrested by Federal agents and held in content of court for failure to abide by the injunction. (link)

In the Eggcorn Forum, Peter Forster suggested (on January 7) that the substitution was a cupertino, but commenter nilep doubted this (on January 10) and suggested instead that it was a demi-eggcorn, but even that analysis is dubious, since contempt is a noun while content (with accent on the second syllable) is an adjective; the substitution looks phonologically motivated (again, probably as a result of an initial mis-hearing).

jute box

October 2, 2009

Another find by David Fenton, very different in character from the last one I posted about: jute box ‘juke box’ and related items. From e-mail to a Wurlitzer site, passed on by Fenton:

what, approximately is a 30 year old wurlitzer (45rpm) jute box in excellent cond. with the records worth?

A couple more hits for jute box, and a couple for jute joint ‘juke joint’:

[on auction site] 1954 Wurlitzer Jute Box 1600 series 48 selection 78 records (link)

jute box stamps by Dennis Holmes (link) [there are shirts with juke boxes on them as well]

Often times my father would take me with him to this jute joint called the Sugar Shack where he sometimes moonlighted as a bouncer. (link)

A show woman sings and dances in a jute joint for people while she wears a revealing red flashy dress. (link)

Certainly non-standard, but where might it have come from?

(more…)

Short shot #15: bodily hygiene

October 2, 2009

Elizabeth Daingerfield Zwicky writes:

My new employer has a sign in the bathroom exhorting us that for safety reasons we should not use the bathroom for “bodily hygiene”. That’s what the showers in another building are for. Scofflaw that I am, I persist in washing my hands.

It turns out that usage differs on how much bodily hygiene covers. For Elizabeth’s new company, it refers specifically to bathing or showering, that is, to washing the body, and similarly for historian and anthropologist  Alan Macfarlane in an article on bodily hygiene in England:

Buchman writes that ‘probably not until 1850 did regular personal washing become routine in large numbers of middle-class households,’ Plenty of literary and other material can be found to support such a view. For instance, a doctor writing in 1801 remarked that ‘most men resident in London and many ladies though accustomed to wash their hands and faces daily, neglect washing their bodies from year to year.’

On the other hand, there are sites (like this one) that specifically mention “hand hygiene” (washing the hands) as a type of bodily hygiene.

(I’m not sure how washing the hair fits into this picture, but I’ll bet that Elizabeth’s company doesn’t want people washing their hair in the bathrooms.)

Some of the variation in usage no doubt arises from the fact that bodily hygiene and personal hygiene are “semi-technical terms”, not really part of everyday English, which are pressed into service, essentially by stipulation, to refer to categories that have no simple everyday labels.

Plant gases

October 2, 2009

At first I was puzzled by the lead headline in the October 1 NYT:

E.P.A. PROPOSES
NEW REGULATIONS
ON PLANT GASES

Plant gases? Like exudations from onions? Or the fragrance of lilacs?

No, not plants the living organisms, but “power plants and large industrial facilities” (as the article puts it). I’m not entirely sure why the ‘living plant’ sense of plant gas is so much easier for me to retrieve than the ‘industrial plant’ sense, but there it is.

It might be a mistake to bring up ambiguous or hard-to-interpret headlines here, since the mention of one usually results in a cascade of further examples, including many old favorites (as in the recent “crash blossoms” thread in Language Log).

Sexual lexicography

October 1, 2009

Over on Slate, Jesse Sheidlower has posted a nice piece (“Can a Woman Prong a Man?”) about the challenges and pleasures of putting sexual vocabulary in the dictionary.