Annals of bureaucracy: the jury summons

Or: how I spent my Friday morning.

On Wednesday I got this mail notice from the Superior Court, County of Santa Clara Office of the Jury Commissioner:


(#1) with some of my information deleted

This morning I went to the website, registered by providing my personal information and went to the Request for Hardship Excusal page, where I completed this section:


(#2) Where I made the crucial error: I was willing to get a hardship excusal just for this occasion, so I submitted this form

Immediately, a response:

Your Request for Hardship Excusal was successfully submitted on 09/20/24.

And then, almost immediately after that:

You are checking too early. To receive your instructions for your assigned week, you will need to return to this web page the weekend (Saturday or Sunday) prior to 10/14/2024.

Oh, crap.

Well, I can’t wait till the last minute to submit my request, because it might be denied. So I called the phone number in #1 to request an excusal. But the automated response said that excusals couldn’t be supplied by phone, only on the website, in writing (by US mail), or in person; and there seemed to be no way to talk to an actual human being about the matter.

So now I must appeal to my family doctor, using Palo Alto Medical Foundation’s messaging system, on which I’ll get an answer in about 3 business days (since this isn’t any kind of emergency). I’m not sure which of my many disabilities he’ll use in his letter, but having to use a walker to get around, being unable to climb stairs, and needing to urinate every 20 or 30 minutes should certainly make me a bad choice as a juror. (I realize that some people in their 80s would make excellent jurors, and I believe that I would be a good assessor of evidence provided in a court, but physically I’m not up to it; it would be a nightmare.)

But now on to the damnable PAMF messaging system. Think good thoughts on my behalf.

 

7 Responses to “Annals of bureaucracy: the jury summons”

  1. Don Peabody Says:

    It’s the peeing that got me removed, forever, from the “jury pool”. Doctor’s letter did the trick.

  2. arnold zwicky Says:

    A further note: the juror information form asks for your mobile phone number (assuming, as everyone does these days, that I have a mobile phone). I just gave my landline number and said (when asked) I couldn’t get messages on it. And just left the “provider’s name” question blank — which the system accepted.

  3. J B Levin Says:

    In Arizona you can be automatically excused if you are 75 years or older. Fortunately, that is not a mandatory excuse, but it’s available to anyone of that age who doesn’t want to (or can’t) serve without needing any further paperwork, since they already know one’s birth date. One must merely tick the appropriate box on the form (online or paper).

  4. arnold zwicky Says:

    Just to note that I don’t think I’ve ever used the noun excusal before. From NOAD:

    (typically in legal contexts) the action or fact of excusing or being excused: he harbored views that would prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties so as to support his excusal for cause.

  5. arnold zwicky Says:

    From Gadi Niram on Facebook:

    GN > AZ: I wish they had a more accommodating system. There is no reason that you should have to be under such stress.

    AZ > GN: Yes, I’ve been running harder and falling further behind, which is truly discouraging. It’s also surprisingly unsettling to have to get a doctor to testify to my body’s failing in old age. (My caregivers are, in contrast, constantly impressed at how much I can do and how healthy I look. But then most of their other patients have various forms of dementia.)

Leave a Reply to Robert CorenCancel reply


Discover more from Arnold Zwicky's Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading