From a news bulletin on NPR yesterday, a report on crowds gathering in Sana, Yemen
for Friday prayers and to continue to press their demands
This has a coordination of unlike syntactic categories, a PP in for (for Friday prayers) and an infinitival VP (to continue to press their demands), so would count as a failure of parallelism according to most of the handbooks. But both conjuncts are functioning as purpose adverbials — for Friday prayers is a brief alternative to something like to say Friday prayers — and this parallelism in function and content frequently trumps the non-parallelism in form.
The coordination of purposive PP in for with purposive VPinf — in either order, though the PP-first order seems to be more frequent, presumably because the PP is usually shorter and lighter than the VPinf — is in fact so common (even outside of informal writing and speech) that it should simply be judged to be standard.
I took up this case briefly in one section of my 2006 “Coordination of unlikes” posting on Language Log, giving four examples:
VPinf + PP: These [recommendations] include the proposals to enlist the help of Iraq’s neighbors and for bolder peacemaking in Palestine. (leader in the Economist, 12/9/06, p. 11)
PP + VPinf: … fighting for prisoners’ rights and to change the system. (Mary Ambrose, announcing her “Your Call” radio program on KALW, 6/7/06)
PP + VPinf: Her only visits to the hospital had been for a variety of broken bones and to deliver her two children. (“Diagnosis” column in the NYT Magazine, 4/25/05, p. 36)
PP + VPinf: … designed for closeness, comfort, and to clean itself automatically (Remington shaver commercial, heard 21/21/04) [this one also has Multiple-Level Coordination in it]
Here are two more from my files:
VPinf + PP: … edited to fit the screen and for content [announcement before movies]
PP + VPinf: I don’t see beauty in [cereal boxes with text in multiple languages]. I see cereal boxes with less room for games and color cartoons and to keep the kids quiet while you eat. (Linguist and lexicographer Jonathan Lighter on ADS-L, 2/26/07)
And then there’s what’s become something of a fixed formula,
for more information or to VP ‘to get/obtain/find/… more information or (to) VP’
which can be found in vast numbers on the web. Here are some googled up this morning — these just from the first page of a great many:
For more information or to request a Foam Encapsulation Certification Permit form contact: … (link)
For more information or to order films, visit our website at … (link)
For more information or to invest in justice today, visit the CBF website. (link)
For More Information or To Enroll Please Call Toll-Free … (link)
For more information or to register for any of the following classes, please call … (link)
March 19, 2011 at 10:53 am |
Related posting here.
March 20, 2011 at 4:14 am |
My first thought about Jonathan Lighter’s comment was that most kids get through the box the first day anyway…
I’d certainly call this standard.
February 5, 2012 at 6:07 pm |
[…] that-clause. I’ve posted on this blog about non-parallelism in purpose adjuncts (here and here), but I seem to have only one other example in my files with an oblique object together with […]