Genital junk

Not long after my posting with Junk Underjeans in it, Ben Zimmer has now nominated junk (specifically for reference to the male genitalia) as the Word of the Year in the American Dialect Society’s annual light-hearted competition. See his “On Language” column for tomorrow’s NYT Magazine, available on-line here; in it, Ben traces this use back to gay fiction writer Ethan Mordden in 1983.

But

Though Mordden incorporated junk into his own slang repertory, it did not enter into its current vogue as a trashy alternative to “the family jewels” until the mid-’90s.

At which point it caught on, leading eventually to “Don’t touch my junk” spreading as an anti-Transportation Security Administration slogan.

Ben goes on to note that

something about the sound and sense of the word must have made it ripe for reinvention. Tom Dalzell, whose latest book is “Damn the Man!: Slang of the Oppressed  in America,” sees junk catching on euphemistically: “To diminish the shock, we call the genitals childish names or use vague and sometimes coy euphemisms — down there, unit or thing.” The Stanford linguist Arnold Zwicky concurs, adding stuff as another euphemistic model for junk. Unlike these other terms, however, junk is a harsh monosyllable evocative of four-letter taboos. Only a word encompassing the innocent and the obscene could have made the cultural impact that junk did, and for that it’s worthy of WOTY commemoration.

Ben had written me a while back, saying:

the question is why “junk” seems “right” as a term for male genitalia, semantically and/or phonetically speaking. Do you have any thoughts on the matter?

My speculative reply, which Ben has artfully boiled down into something relatively non-technical and also fit to print in the Times:

My guess is that the process involves both the narrowing of “stuff” ‘belongings’ to a euphemism for genitalia and the extension of “junk” from ‘worthless items’ to ‘stuff, belongings’. So “don’t touch my stuff” can be used (is used) to warn someone away from your genitalia, and then “junk” can be as well. “Junk” is even better than “stuff” for this purpose, since though both are monosyllables with the vowel of “fuck”, “junk” has the final k, so it sounds a bit more sexual but is still an innocent ordinary word (unlike “shit”, which has the ‘stuff, belongings’ sense, but is a taboo word).

A side issue: Ben considered the possible influence of  the slang “junk in the trunk” ‘large buttocks’ on genital “junk” and discovered that the dating would make this possible:

As discussed on ADS-L recently, “junk in the trunk” is a hiphop usage attested from 1993 (“Dazzey Duks” by Duice). So that predates the post-Mordden revitalization of genital “junk” by a few years.

There was no space in the column to play with this speculation (and I can’t imagine how to work in a mention of Junk Underjeans, though they do suggest that junk might be on its way from euphemism to mild taboo word).


7 Responses to “Genital junk

  1. More junk-touching « Arnold Zwicky's Blog Says:

    [...] blog posting on a “Venn diagram” purporting to illustrate who gets paid to touch your junk, [...]

  2. Caroline Says:

    Ok, I’m getting really tired of “junk” in this sense; no part of a man’s body is trash. A man’s sexuality is not trash.

    • arnold zwicky Says:

      Well, for lots of people, junk has developed a new sense, no longer directly connected to the older ‘trash’ sense; these people are not referring to a man’s genitalia as trash. You seem to be unable to shake the ‘trash’ associations, but you should recognize that other people have done so and not attribute your associations to them.

      Yet another case in which etymology is not destiny.

  3. arnold zwicky Says:

    From my Princeton classmate Barry Bosak, on reading this posting:

    when my four year old grandson went to grab his 6 year old brother’s “stuff” and used some term (I forgot) his dad immediately reprimanded him. Interestingly, the 8 year old sister just said “use a nice word, just call them tenders.”

    Tenders was news to me, but there seems to be some child use, as in this blog comment:

    Thanks Off Beat Mama for posting my story! I am glad this has generated so many thought provoking comments. Big J lately uses the term tenders to describe his parts since that’s was Po uses in the movie Kung Fu Panda. They are indeed tender so sure, why not?

  4. Package deal « Arnold Zwicky's Blog Says:

    [...] I’ve posted about several times here) and junk (see “Genital junk”, here). Here’s Ben Zimmer on ADS-L making the junk-deal connection: In my On Language column on [...]

  5. Raping and punking « Arnold Zwicky's Blog Says:

    [...] including meanings that come from distinctly unpleasant roots. I understand that using junk to refer to a man’s genitals doesn’t necessarily demean those genitals as trash (in fact, for me, this use of junk [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 237 other followers

%d bloggers like this: